更新于2026-02-06 Updated on 6-Feb-2026 (English version is at the bottom)
猪模型解剖居家科研小组是在新冠疫情背景下成立的。疫情前夕，只有几位整形与重建外科、骨科医师偶尔交流一些关于猪皮瓣模型的文献。疫情期间，这种交流明显增多，同时也有更多同行加入我们，交流的范围也逐渐扩大到更多血管相关的猪模型。这期间，我们提出了一些科学问题，设计了一些实验方案。然而，理想很丰满，现实很骨感。疫情之后，当我们着手开展实验时，我们不得不直面三大困难。第一，大部分同行没有课题，研究经费如何解决？第二，实验场所、实验设备如何解决？第三，如何通过伦理审批？为了克服这三大困难，我们选择居家研究猪的比较解剖学这一研究方向，由此产生了我们的第一个特色：居家科研。
一开始，实验进行得非常不顺利，因为我们遇到了第四大困难。作为非解剖学专业人员，我们很难用经典的乳胶灌注法完成尸体的准备。灌注后的标本不是臭掉，就是频繁出现漏胶，解剖体验很差，实验效率很低。一个偶然的机会，我们发现液态的猪油，放入冰箱不久就变为固态，而且具备一定强度。查阅解剖技术类的书籍，我们发现，热敏的灌注液（比如明胶、琼脂、黄蜡等）很早就被用来灌注尸体血管，但并非主流的灌注技术。我们还发现，并没有猪油用于尸体血管灌注的报道。所以，我们首先使用并报道了基于猪油的尸体血管灌注技术，结果表明，这一技术安全、有效、无技术门槛，极大地提高了实验效率。由此产生了我们的第二个特色：基于猪油的尸体血管灌注技术。
虽然解剖学是一门很古老的学科，但比较解剖学是近几十年才发展起来的新兴交叉学科，具有广阔的发展前景。截至2026年2月，我们已经发表了18篇论文，总影响因子23分。这充分说明我们的研究方向是被同行认可的，是具备一定学术价值的，也证明基于猪油的尸体血管灌注技术具有推广价值。基于此，我们建立了这一网站，希望通过与全球同行交流，共同进步，从而探索更多猪模型的解剖。我们建立这一网站，也为了能跟同行分享我们的实验技巧、投稿心得。虽然研究的专业不一定相同，但科研本身有其共性，我们希望更多同行能从中获益。
The home-based research group for pig model anatomy was established against the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic. Before the outbreak of the epidemic, only a few plastic and reconstructive surgeons and orthopedic surgeons occasionally exchanged some literature on pig flap models. During the epidemic, such exchanges significantly increased. Moreover, more colleagues have joined us, and the scope of exchanges has gradually expanded to include more vessel-related pig models. During this period, we raised several scientific questions and designed several experiments. However, ideals are full and rich, while reality is harsh and unyielding. After the epidemic, when we set out to carry out experiments, we had to confront three major difficulties directly. First, most of our colleagues have no research projects. How can we solve the funding problem? Second, how can the issues of experimental sites and equipment be addressed? Third, how can ethical approval be passed? To overcome these three major difficulties, we chose the comparative anatomy of pig models as our research direction, which gave rise to our first feature: home-based scientific research.
At the beginning, our experiment did not go smoothly because we encountered the fourth major difficulty. As nonanatomy professionals, it is very difficult for us to prepare cadavers using the classic latex infusion method. After perfusion, the specimens either stink or frequently leak latex, resulting in very poor anatomical experience and low experimental efficiency. By chance, we found that liquid lard would turn solid soon after being put in the refrigerator and had a certain strength. By consulting books on anatomical techniques, we report that heat-sensitive perfusion materials (such as gelatin, AGAR, and yellow wax) have long been used to infuse blood vessels in cadavers, but they are not mainstream perfusion techniques. We also found that there were no reports of the use of lard for vascular perfusion in cadavers. Therefore, for the first time, we used and reported lard-based vascular perfusion technology in cadavers. The results showed that this technology was safe and effective and had no technical threshold, greatly improving the experimental efficiency. This has led to our second feature: lard-based vascular perfusion technology in cadavers.
Although anatomy is a very ancient discipline, comparative anatomy is an emerging interdisciplinary discipline that has developed only in recent decades and has broad prospects for development. As of February 2026, we have published 18 papers with a total impact factor of 23. This fully demonstrates that our research direction is recognized by peers and has certain academic value. These findings also prove that the lard-based vascular perfusion technology in cadavers exhibited certain promotional value. On this basis, we have established this website, hoping to communicate with more colleagues around the world and make progress together, thereby exploring the anatomy of more pig models. We also established this website to share our experimental techniques and submission experiences with our colleagues. Although the research fields may not be the same, scientific research itself has its own commonalities. We hope that more colleagues can benefit from it.